What does research say about the impact of actions like throwing tomato soup at artworks to warn of the climate crisis?

What does research say about the impact of actions like throwing tomato soup at artworks to warn of the climate crisis?

“To raise awareness of the need to tackle climate change, some advocates of the cause non-violent acts including interrupting and damaging morning traffic artworks. Will these actions reduce your situation? support efforts to address climate change, do they increase or do they not affect your support in some way? This question was asked to 1,031 people in the United States. One of the respondents 46% were confident that these actions caused them to lower their support40% do not impress them and 13% increase their sympathy for reason

this ResearchPublished by the Annenberg Center for Public Policy at the University of Pennsylvania (United States), it examines these groups in more detail: Among the people who viewed such protests most negatively, 27% said the actions had a very negative impact on them. climate change advocacy, 13% slightly lowered their support and 6% slightly lowered their support.

Encouraged by these recent destructive actions, the distribution in the group is as follows: 5% expressed a large increase in support of actions against climate change, 6% expressed a “slight increase” and 2% a slight increase. Finally, 40% of respondents assured that their support to stop the climate crisis is indifferent to such actions. However, the study’s authors emphasize that 48% of respondents were little or not at all affected by these actions, given those who were unaffected and those who answered “somewhat” in other responses.

However, views on these actions show changing demographics and vary according to political ideology. 69% of those interviewed who consider themselves Republicans reject these non-violent acts, compared to 27% among Democrats. In any case, “you should pay attention to the emerging evidence, because Not all societies are the same, neither actions nor political moment”, he stated maldita.es environmentalist Andreu Escriva.

Moreover, to men and whites “Non-violent destructive” actions, as the report defines them, further undermine support for climate change efforts (51% men vs 43% women and 52% whites vs 31% blacks, 41% Hispanics and 37% other races), according to the survey.

On the other hand, most increased support for climate change due to these actions nonviolent blacks (28%), Democrats (21%), people of other races (20%), and Hispanics (18%). The environmentalist qualifies that “we must distinguish between the action itself and the space it opens up.” “Through these actions, I have had the opportunity to talk about climate change in recent weeks. Even if you don’t like it, these moves make you think about it.”

Following one of the protests mentioned in the study, where two teenagers threw the visible contents of two boxes. Tomato soup to Vincent Van Gogh’s ‘Sunflowers’The museum, where the artifact is located, made a statement that the painting was not damaged, as we mentioned above. maldita.es.

The study takes this fact into account and asked half of the respondents “whether damaging works of art” affects them and the other half”pretending to damage works of art” he changed his mind. But the way he asked the question did not. It was also measured whether these tactics affect people’s perception of climate change, and a negative result was obtained.

Well, The public’s view of the protest is the same. even knowing that the works of art were not damaged. “There is a lot of research on the subject. We must continue to do sociological studies”, concludes Andreu Escrivà.

#research #impact #actions #throwing #tomato #soup #artworks #warn #climate #crisis

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *